THE number of new homes being approved on greenbelt land in England has increased five-fold in the last five years, according to figures obtained by the BBC.
In 2009-10 planning permission was granted for 2,258 homes, while in 2014-15 the figure rose to 11,977.
In the last year alone the number of approvals doubled.
The government insists greenbelt development is a matter for local planning authorities.
Green belts were created to prevent urban sprawl and stop neighbouring towns merging into one another.
England has 14 green belts, covering 13% of total land.
Government policy states that the greenbelt should only be built on in "exceptional circumstances". But local authorities, hard pressed to supply land for development, are turning to green belt sites to try to satisfy housing demand.
Some estimates suggest that 250,000 homes need to be built each year to solve the housing crisis in the UK.
Areas feeling the most pressure include Hertfordshire, where the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) says sites for 34,000 homes have already been proposed, with another 10,000 waiting in the wings.
"We are getting continual statements by government ministers, correspondence from government departments to various bodies like to us saying it is their determination to protect the greenbelt and the wider countryside," said Kevin Fitzgerald from Hertfordshire CPRE.
"But, nevertheless, throughout our county, our planning authorities are coming out with these proposals for quite major development."
Research carried out on behalf of BBC Radio 4’s File on 4 programme by Glenigan, a leading provider of construction data, found a sharp increase in the number of houses securing full planning approval in the greenbelt.
In 2009/10, 2,258 homes were approved. In 2013/2014, the number had risen to 5,607. By the following year, 2014/2015, it had more than doubled to 11,977.
Housing and Planning Minister Brandon Lewis told the programme it was up to local authorities to decide the future of their greenbelt:
"Greenbelt is something that has been there to give a strategic protection to those green lungs. We have outlined what local areas need to do if they want to go through a review of their greenbelt.
"It is very much a matter of those local authorities. They are the best placed people locally, democratically accountable locally, to decide where is the right location for any development."
Professor Paul Cheshire from the London School of Economics said the idea of the greenbelt was misunderstood and had nothing to do with the quality of the land:
"You only need a tiny amount of the least environmentally-attractive greenbelt to solve the housing land shortage for generations to come, whereas Areas of
Outstanding Natural Beauty and National Parks do provide huge benefit."
But File on 4 has found evidence of proposed development even within these highly-protected landscapes.
