NOT a single student from Thurrock has gone up to Oxford or Cambridge in the last three years, according to a report by the Sutton Trust.
The report accuses Oxford and Cambridge of being so socially exclusive that they recruit more students from eight top schools than almost 3,000 other English state schools put together.
The Sutton Trust social mobility charity says the leading universities are failing to attract a wide enough range of talent.
Trust founder Sir Peter Lampl said all young people needed a “fair chance”.
The study examined Oxford and Cambridge admissions data between 2015 and 2017 and found a handful of schools, mostly private, disproportionately dominating the number of places awarded.
The study shows that Thurrock, Rochdale and Southampton were three areas where not a single student was accepted into Oxford or Cambridge. This compares to Kingston-on-Thames where 150 students were offered places.
The study blames a lack of advice and guidance for applicants and calls for better information about what is required for entry and for admissions to take into account young people’s backgrounds.
“If we are to ensure that all young people, regardless of their background, have a fair chance of getting in to our top universities, we need to address the patchwork of higher education guidance and support,” said Sir Peter Lampl.
“All young people, regardless of what area they grow up in, or what school they go to, should have access to high quality personal guidance that allows them to make the best informed choices about their future.”
Martin Williams, Oxford University’s pro-vice-chancellor for education, said the university accepted the need to do more to widen access.
“We are very much aware that Oxford must work harder to attract a more representative selection of students from across the UK,” said Prof Williams.
The university says it spends £7m per year on outreach schemes and is promising a new “detailed action plan” with changes to make sure there are places for students of “outstanding potential from all backgrounds”.
A spokesman for the University of Cambridge welcomed the idea that “more support should be made available to students before they choose their A-level subjects and agree there should be more provision of careers advice”.
But Cambridge rejected “lowering grade requirements”, saying this would “place unfair pressure on students and that is something the university cannot support”.
The Education Secretary Damian Hinds, speaking on Thursday, said that leading universities should accept students with the new technical qualifications, known as T-levels.
He said it would be an “error” to have a “blanket rejection” of young people applying with the new vocational exams, where they were relevant.
Oxford University says it is waiting to see how the T-levels develop before making a decision.
Mr Hinds was launching plans for an overhaul of vocational education – saying such exams needed to be of sufficiently high quality to be held in the same esteem as A-levels and academic qualifications.
“It needs a system which is very high quality, is well invested in, is well accepted – and not everybody passes,” he said.
He warned of a “plethora of mediocre” qualifications that not well understood by either the public or employers but said, he wanted to remove “false barriers” between academic and vocational qualifications and that both could be routes into higher education.
On the Sutton Trust report, Mr Hinds said: “Whilst potential and talent is evenly spread, the opportunities to make the most of it sometimes aren’t.
“Recent data shows progress has been made for disadvantaged students going to university, there is still a long way to go.
“I want universities to work with us, consider the data carefully and look at their own admissions policies to work out what can be done to ensure that their university is open to everyone who has the potential, no matter their background or where they are from.”