THE RCVS disciplinary committee has directed that an Aveley based vet has her name removed from the register for a series of clinical failures and failing to respond to reasonable requests from the regulator.
The hearing for Anne Mullen, who had four charges against her, was held in her absence from 31 January to 7 February after she had indicated she would not be engaging with the disciplinary process.
Charges
The charges stated:
- She had failed to provide adequate information to her clients regarding arrangements for her practice out-of-hours/emergency care in April and July 2019.
- In relation to her spay surgery on a Labrador named Cleo on 19 July 2019: she had discharged Cleo when the dog was unfit to be discharged; discharged her with an inappropriate/inadequate abdominal dressing; and failed to provide adequate information to Cleo’s owners regarding complications from surgery, risk of postoperative haemorrhage and arrangements for out-of-hours care, as well as failing to make adequate clinical records.
- In relation to surgery on a bulldog named Boycie on 15 October 2019: she had failed to obtain informed consent for anaesthesia/surgery from his owners; failed to ensure the dog had adequate monitoring while recovering from anaesthesia; failed to offer an adequate range of overnight care for the dog; left the dog alone overnight when he was not in a fit condition to be left; failed to provide information to his owners on postoperative care at home and OOH emergency arrangements; and failed to make adequate clinical records relating to his treatment.
- She failed to have professional indemnity insurance (PII) or equivalent arrangements in place and/or failed to provide adequate details of it, failed to respond to requests regarding her CPD records, and failed to respond adequately to reasonable requests from the college for details and documents regarding her treatment of Cleo and Boycie.
Brain damage
In relation to the charges, the committee heard evidence from a number of witnesses, including the animals’ owners, an expert veterinary witness and college staff.
In the evidence , the committee heard Cleo had died while undergoing treatment at another veterinary practice from complications arising from blood loss following Mrs Mullen’s surgery on her. They also heard Boycie had suffered brain damage and had lost his sight due to postoperative hypoxia, although he had otherwise recovered.
Having heard all the evidence, the committee found all the charges against Mrs Mullen proven.
Aggravating factors
The committee then went on to consider whether the proven charges, individually and/or cumulatively, amounted to serious professional misconduct. In doing so, it considered the aggravating factors in this case, including that actual injury had occurred to animals, the misconduct was sustained and repeated over a period of time, the conduct directly contravened advice issued by the RCVS, and the blatant disregard of the RCVS’ regulatory role.
It also took into consideration that Mrs Mullen had previously been suspended from the register for a period of two months in April 2017 for failing to have PII arrangements in place.
Charges proven
It considered that no mitigating factors existed in the case and, accordingly, found serious professional misconduct in relation to all the proven charges.
The committee considered the conduct was so serious that the only means of protecting animal health and welfare, and public confidence in the profession was to direct the registrar to remove Mrs Mullen’s name from the register.
‘Reckless disregard’
Judith Way, chairing the committee and speaking on its behalf, said: “In the view of the committee, if [Mrs Mullen] were permitted to remain on the register, there would be a serious risk of harm to animals.
“She has demonstrated a reckless disregard for the obligations of a registered veterinary surgeon.”
Mrs Mullen has 28 days from being informed of the committee’s decision to lodge an appeal with the Privy Council.
Mrs Mullen was always very caring and professional in her dealings with our two dogs and two tortoises, who she cared for over a number of years. She never ever charged extortionate prices for treatments or drugs, and the local pet owners depended on her to keep their pets healthy at a price they could afford.
In the twelve months she has been gone, we have had to find over a thousand pounds for treatment for our animals, a price as pensioners, we can ill afford.
If it’s the vets in high street Avery I heard good reports
They all had it in for Ann for years, 2 dogs sadly died but hundreds where treated and saved as she did not rip people
Off and did the job for the animals not the money!! Such a shame that a lot of people will not financially be able to now treat their dogs
I took my dog there to have his teeth out she then castrated him cause she said he had testicular cancer there was no after care and ever since then my dog has never been the same he came out of that vets coverd in blood she told me there was no other cancers in his body he now has throat cancer the women should never practice again
I took my dog sam to her to have his teeth out she allso took away his testicalls cause she said he had cancer two hrs later she phoned us up to pick him up when we got there his face was coverrd in blood he look in a right state he has never been the same since