THE 2011 CENSUS has revealed the massive changes in the ethnic groupings in Thurrock compared to ten years ago.
Although, the borough is still predominantly “white”, with 127,587 people classified as “White (English/Irish/Scottish/Welsh)”,it is the number of Black Africans who have come to Thurrock in the last ten years that has really rocketed.
In 2001, there were only 577 people who marked the box Black African or Black Caribbean on the census form. That figure has now risen to 9742.
109 resident identified themselves as Black or Black British in 2001. That figure has risen to 1245.
151 residents identified themselves as Mixed (White and Black African). That has risen to 670.
The chinese population has decreased from 546 to 254 and the white irish has also declined from 1518 to 1108.
The full figures are:
White (English/Irish/Scottish/Welsh): 127,587
White Irish: 1,108
Gypsy/Traveller: 308
White Other: 6,426
Mixed White/Black Caribbean: 1.051
Mixed White/Black African: 670
Mixed White/Asian: 683
Other mixed: 690
Indian: 2,234
Pakistan: 534
Bangladesh: 682
Chinese: 828
Other asian: 1,649
African: 9,742
Caribbean: 1,336
Other Black: 1,245
Arab: 254
How can this be. Labour had no policy of mass immigration. It’s all just a myth. Labour had no poliocy of moving iimmigrants out of London into Thurrock. It’s just the racists making it up. You only have to look at the schools around Grays to know that this figure is hugely understated. Perhaps the Labour party were lying through their teeth after all. No perhaps about it they were. So pround of their multicultural failed experiment that they spent 10 years lying about it and now spend all their time denying it.
NoVoice.
If its all Labour’s fault, how is it even worse in some parts of Europe?
I rest my case JMW118. Denial in the face of overwhelming evidence yet still Labour supporters are in denial. Next you’ll say you’re not a Labour supporter.
[…] […]
NoVoice. Coming from a tory middle class family, I cannot understand your assumption that I am a Labour supporter.
You didn’t answer my question about mass immigration in other parts of Europe.
But in the face of apparent arrogance, perhaps I will lean towards Socialism!
No country who is signed up the EU superstate can have proper control of its borders no matter what governments of various countries may say. The idea of the EU is to create a ‘United States of Europe’ whereby each nation becomes a state, such as in the US. In order to form a new identity which relates to this idea they have to attempt to erode each individual nations culture and identity…using mass immigration is one way to do this. These new residents are also more likely to buy into this European ideal and feel an alligence to Europe rather than to their new country. This is the reason for allowing Eastern Europe to move across the continent without a proper system in place, why African immigrants who arrive in Spain and Greece via a dangerous sea crossing are permanently held in those countries rather than being sent back.
10 years ago the UK was just still too white and British for the EU so they, along with the Labour party, set about changing that while Labour made sure that anyone who disagreed with it would be branded a racist, bigot etc etc. William Hague did say in 2001 that if Labour were elected again they would change the face of the UK – he was right.
Thank you Bernard87, then perhaps Ukip have the answer?
It’s not a new theory JMW118. The socialists have had this one in mind for decades. It never ceases to amaze me how many people will defend the policies of the Labour party and then deny having anything to do with them. Regardless of the reasons it has happened, the Labour party bent over backwards to deny it and did brand any detractors racist. They lied through their teeth to the electorate. I wonder how many people would have voted for them if they had put their policy of mass immigration to the public. The left also like to attack the church because they also see that as one of the last bastions of white protestant rule in the west. The left want to rule in perpetuity just like the good old socialists of the former USSR and current day China. At least the Chinese are more forward looking in terms of their economy than marxists trying to break down thousands of years of history and culture in Europe and the West in general.